The same customer, product or supplier exists in six systems, six times, slightly differently. Every count is argued with. Every correction has to be made six times. Every audit answer is assembled by hand.
Master data programmes fail on sponsorship, scope and integration politics — not on technology. Most organisations have already tried once.
MDM Studio puts the programme layer — sponsorship, sequencing, stewardship, adoption — inside the product, and runs inside your perimeter on a database you already license and staff.
Approve one scoped working session on one domain. Bounded cost, no platform purchase, no integration commitment. Output is a defensible estimate for the full estate.
Every one of these is a sponsorship or sequencing failure wearing a technical costume. If your last attempt stalled, it stalled on one of them.
No named owner who can decide whose definition wins. The business rejects the golden record and keeps its own extract.
Every domain in scope, modelling for months, first governed record after the sponsor has moved on.
Stewardship added on top of a full-time job, with no queue and no evidence it matters. The exceptions report goes unread.
Source system owners refuse writes. Six months are spent negotiating access instead of mastering anything.
Two customers wrongly combined, nobody can explain why, undoing it needs a ticket. From then on the hub is “the system’s view”.
Data in a proprietary store, cost rising on a metric you don’t control, leaving means a second migration.
| Risk | What the product does about it | Make us show you |
|---|---|---|
| No real owner | A stakeholder register per domain — sponsor, owner, steward — with RACI, decision rights and stated concerns, held in the hub. | The named sponsor of a domain and what they can decide. |
| Wrong scope, wrong order | Domains scored on business criticality and plotted value-against-gap, so sequencing is a chart rather than a negotiation. | Which of your domains to master first, and why. |
| Stewardship doesn’t stick | Failed rules become owned, aged, SLA-tracked exceptions in a personal queue — not a weekly report. | One steward’s queue: what is overdue and who owns it. |
| Integration politics | Read-only by default. Writing back is opt-in per attribute, and can be handed to the source owner as a script they run themselves. | Master a domain with no write access to any source. |
| A bad merge | Every merge keeps its evidence. A steward can reverse one in a single governed, audited action. | Merge two records, split them back, show the audit trail. |
| Lock-in | Golden records sit in your own database. Configuration exports. A lapsed licence degrades to the free edition rather than locking you out. | Query your golden records in SQL without us. |
The hub runs on SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL or Oracle — whichever you already run — beside the databases it masters, inside your perimeter.
No new database to license or staff. No vendor cloud, so no egress charges and no third-party processor on your privacy register.
We stand up a hub on a single VM inside your perimeter, connect a sample of your own sources, and walk your data from first extract to golden record — live. You see the match evidence, the survivorship decisions, the audit trail and the exception queue on records you recognise.
If you already run an MDM platform, we point ours at the same sources and show you, read-only, exactly where the two answers differ before anything is cut over.
What you get: a defensible estimate for the full estate, and evidence to approve or decline the programme on. What you commit: nothing beyond the session.